Nissan Note 2009 vs Mazda Demio 1997
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 1.6 (petrol, diesel) | 1.3 - 1.5 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 88 - 110 HP | 63 - 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 128 - 240 NM | 103 - 116 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 - 13.4 seconds | 13 - 16.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 - 6.8 | 6.0 - 7.9 | |
|
Nissan Note petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mazda Demio. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.10 m | 3.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.67 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.54 m | |
|
Nissan Note is larger. Nissan Note is 28 cm longer than the Mazda Demio, 3 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Note is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 280 litres | 330 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1332 litres | 1298 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Nissan Note has 50 litres less trunk space than the Mazda Demio. This could mean that the Nissan Note uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Note (by 34 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 9.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Note is 1.8 metres more than that of the Mazda Demio, which means Nissan Note can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`588 | ~ 1`475 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Note has
|
Mazda Demio has
| |