Nissan Navara 2005 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 3.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 144 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 356 NM | 373 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 14 seconds | |
| Nissan Navara engine produces 26 HP less power than Mitsubishi Pajero, whereas torque is 17 NM less than Mitsubishi Pajero. Despite less power, Nissan Navara reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 | 10.6 | |
|
The Nissan Navara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Navara consumes 2.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that by driving the Nissan Navara over 15,000 km in a year you can save 375 litres of fuel. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.22 m | 4.90 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.87 m | |
| Nissan Navara is 32 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Navara is 12 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 215 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1790 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.4 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 2`805 kg | 3`300 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 5800 | 11 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Navara has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |