Nissan Navara 2005 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2001
Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.7 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Double-row timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 144 HP | 163 HP | |
Torque: | 356 NM | 400 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
Jeep Grand Cherokee is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Navara engine produces 19 HP less power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, whereas torque is 44 NM less than Jeep Grand Cherokee. Due to the lower power, Nissan Navara reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 | 9.7 | |
The Nissan Navara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Navara consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that by driving the Nissan Navara over 15,000 km in a year you can save 240 litres of fuel. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 480'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Jeep Grand Cherokee engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 27 years | 3 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan Pathfinder, Nissan Murano | Used only for this car | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Navara might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
The Jeep Grand Cherokee engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.22 m | 4.61 m | |
Width: | 1.85 m | 1.84 m | |
Height: | 1.75 m | 1.84 m | |
Nissan Navara is larger, but lower. Nissan Navara is 61 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, width is practically the same , while the height of Nissan Navara is 9 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 1104 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2047 litres | |
Turning diameter: | no data | 11.9 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 2`805 | 2`506 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | below average | |
Average price (€): | 6800 | 3400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Navara has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |