Nissan Navara 2005 vs Mitsubishi L 200 2006

 
Nissan Navara
2005 - 2010
Mitsubishi L 200
2006 - 2012
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.5 Diesel2.5 Diesel
Camshaft drive: Double-row timing chainTiming belt
Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating.

Performance

Power: 144 HP168 HP
Torque: 356 NM402 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.8 secondsn/a seconds
Nissan Navara engine produces 24 HP less power than Mitsubishi L 200, whereas torque is 46 NM less than Mitsubishi L 200.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.1no data
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 440'000 km300'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Nissan Navara engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 27 years30 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan Pathfinder, Nissan MuranoUsed only for this car
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts.

Dimensions

Length: 5.22 mno data
Width: 1.85 mno data
Height: 1.75 mno data
Trunk capacity: no datano data
Turning diameter: no datano data
Gross weight (kg): 2`8052`910
Safety: no data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 66008400
Pros and Cons: Nissan Navara has
  • timing chain engine
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • lower price
Mitsubishi L 200 has
  • timing belt engine
  • more power
  • has 4x4 drive
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv