Nissan Navara 2005 vs Mitsubishi L 200 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Double-row timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 144 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 356 NM | 314 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 14.6 seconds | |
|
Nissan Navara is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Navara engine produces 8 HP more power than Mitsubishi L 200, whereas torque is 42 NM more than Mitsubishi L 200. Thanks to more power Nissan Navara reaches 100 km/h speed 2.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 | 8.6 | |
|
The Nissan Navara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Navara consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi L 200, which means that by driving the Nissan Navara over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 300'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Nissan Navara engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 27 years | 30 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan Pathfinder, Nissan Murano | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.22 m | 5.08 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Nissan Navara is larger, but slightly lower. Nissan Navara is 15 cm longer than the Mitsubishi L 200, 5 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Navara is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`805 | 2`850 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6800 | 8400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Navara has
|
Mitsubishi L 200 has
| |