Nissan Navara 2005 vs Ford Ranger 2006
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 144 HP | 156 HP | |
Torque: | 356 NM | 380 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 13.7 seconds | |
Nissan Navara engine produces 12 HP less power than Ford Ranger, whereas torque is 24 NM less than Ford Ranger. Despite less power, Nissan Navara reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 | 10.2 | |
The Nissan Navara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Navara consumes 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Ranger, which means that by driving the Nissan Navara over 15,000 km in a year you can save 315 litres of fuel. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.22 m | 5.08 m | |
Width: | 1.85 m | 1.79 m | |
Height: | 1.75 m | 1.76 m | |
Nissan Navara is larger, but slightly lower. Nissan Navara is 14 cm longer than the Ford Ranger, 6 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 1500 litres | |
Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | 2`805 | 3`000 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 6600 | 7400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Navara has
|
Ford Ranger has
| |