Nissan Navara 2005 vs Ford Ranger 2006
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 144 HP | 143 HP | |
Torque: | 356 NM | 330 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
Nissan Navara is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Navara engine produces 1 HP more power than Ford Ranger, whereas torque is 26 NM more than Ford Ranger. Thanks to more power Nissan Navara reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 | 8.9 | |
The Nissan Navara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Navara consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Ranger, which means that by driving the Nissan Navara over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.22 m | 5.08 m | |
Width: | 1.85 m | 1.72 m | |
Height: | 1.75 m | 1.62 m | |
Nissan Navara is larger. Nissan Navara is 15 cm longer than the Ford Ranger, 13 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Navara is 13 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 1500 litres | |
Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | 2`805 | 2`900 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 6600 | 7200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Navara has
|
| |