Nissan Navara 2005 vs Chevrolet Colorado 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.8 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Nissan Navara) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Chevrolet Colorado) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 144 HP | 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 356 NM | 251 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Nissan Navara engine produces 33 HP less power than Chevrolet Colorado, but torque is 105 NM more than Chevrolet Colorado. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 | 10.5 | |
|
The Nissan Navara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Navara consumes 2.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Colorado, which means that by driving the Nissan Navara over 15,000 km in a year you can save 360 litres of fuel. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.22 m | 5.26 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.66 m | |
| Nissan Navara is 4 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Colorado, 11 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Navara is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 645 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`805 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6400 | 6800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Navara has
|
Chevrolet Colorado has
| |