Nissan Navara 2005 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 1998
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.0 Petrol | 4.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 265 HP | 198 HP | |
| Torque: | 385 NM | 312 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Nissan Navara engine produces 67 HP more power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, whereas torque is 73 NM more than Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.8 | 13.1 | |
|
The Jeep Grand Cherokee is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Navara consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Navara could require 105 litres more fuel. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.22 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.76 m | |
|
Nissan Navara is larger, but slightly lower. Nissan Navara is 61 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 1 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Navara is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1104 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2047 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.1 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`535 | 2`427 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 6800 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Navara has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |