Nissan Navara 2005 vs Chrysler Pacifica 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 4.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 154 HP | 257 HP | |
| Torque: | 235 NM | 355 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Nissan Navara engine produces 103 HP less power than Chrysler Pacifica, whereas torque is 120 NM less than Chrysler Pacifica. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 12.3 | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Chrysler Pacifica) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Nissan Navara) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.22 m | 5.05 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 2.01 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.74 m | |
| Nissan Navara is 17 cm longer than the Chrysler Pacifica, 17 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Navara is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 370 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 370 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2250 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12.1 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6400 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Chrysler Pacifica has
| |