Nissan Navara 2005 vs Infiniti FX 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.0 Petrol | 3.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 265 HP | 280 HP | |
| Torque: | 385 NM | 366 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 7.1 seconds | |
| Nissan Navara engine produces 15 HP less power than Infiniti FX, but torque is 19 NM more than Infiniti FX. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.8 | 12.1 | |
|
The Infiniti FX is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Navara consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Infiniti FX, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Navara could require 255 litres more fuel. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 21 years | 25 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan Pathfinder, Nissan Murano | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Infiniti FX might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.22 m | 4.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.93 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.65 m | |
| Nissan Navara is 42 cm longer than the Infiniti FX, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Navara is 13 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 776 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1826 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`340 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6000 | 4800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Infiniti FX has
| |