Nissan Navara 2005 vs Chrysler Pacifica 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.0 Petrol | 4.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 265 HP | 257 HP | |
| Torque: | 385 NM | 355 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Nissan Navara engine produces 8 HP more power than Chrysler Pacifica, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Chrysler Pacifica. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.8 | 12.3 | |
|
The Chrysler Pacifica is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Navara consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Pacifica, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Navara could require 225 litres more fuel. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Chrysler Pacifica) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Nissan Navara) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 21 years | 4 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Chrysler Town & Country, Dodge Caravan, Volkswagen Routan | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Chrysler Pacifica engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.22 m | 5.05 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 2.01 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.74 m | |
| Nissan Navara is 17 cm longer than the Chrysler Pacifica, 17 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Navara is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 370 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 370 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2250 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12.1 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 5600 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Navara has
|
Chrysler Pacifica has
| |