Nissan Navara 2005 vs Nissan Pathfinder 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Double-row timing chain | Double-row timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 174 HP | 174 HP | |
| Torque: | 403 NM | 403 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 11.6 seconds | |
| Nissan Navara and Nissan Pathfinder have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Nissan Navara reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.2 | 10.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 12.6 l/100km | 11.1 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Pathfinder is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Nissan Navara consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Pathfinder, which means that by driving the Nissan Navara over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Nissan Navara consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Pathfinder. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 860 km in combined cycle | 790 km in combined cycle | |
| 1020 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| 630 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 440'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 28 years | 28 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.22 m | 4.74 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.78 m | |
| Nissan Navara is 48 cm longer than the Nissan Pathfinder, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 515 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 515 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 2091 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 13.3 meters | 12.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Navara is 0.9 metres more than that of the Nissan Pathfinder, which means Nissan Navara can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 3`000 kg | 2`880 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`050 kg | 2`165 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 950 kg | 715 kg | |
| Nissan Navara load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 25 procentiem more than Nissan Pathfinder. Therefore, Nissan Navara is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 5400 | 5400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Navara has
|
Nissan Pathfinder has
| |