Nissan Navara 2005 vs Volvo XC90 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.4 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Double-row timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 174 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 403 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
Nissan Navara is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Navara engine produces 11 HP more power than Volvo XC90, whereas torque is 63 NM more than Volvo XC90. Thanks to more power Nissan Navara reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 9.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.3 l/100km | 9.3 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Navara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Navara consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90, which means that by driving the Nissan Navara over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 940 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 1090 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| 860 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Navara gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Volvo XC90 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 27 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan Pathfinder, Nissan Murano | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Volvo V70, Volvo S80, Volvo S60, Volvo XC70, Volvo C30 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Volvo XC90 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.22 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.74 m | |
| Nissan Navara is 42 cm longer than the Volvo XC90, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Navara is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 249 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2404 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 13.3 meters | 12.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Navara is 0.6 metres more than that of the Volvo XC90, which means Nissan Navara can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`000 | 2`735 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 6000 | 4200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Navara has
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |