Nissan Navara 2005 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Double-row timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 174 HP | 173 HP | |
| Torque: | 403 NM | 410 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Navara engine produces 1 HP more power than Toyota Land Cruiser, but torque is 7 NM less than Toyota Land Cruiser. Despite the higher power, Nissan Navara reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 9.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.3 l/100km | 11.2 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Navara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Navara consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means that by driving the Nissan Navara over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Navara consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 87 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 940 km in combined cycle | 960 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km with real consumption | 770 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 27 years | 25 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan Pathfinder, Nissan Murano | Used also on Toyota Hilux | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Navara might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Toyota Land Cruiser 2006 3.0 engine: The engine tends to be noisy and vibrate.
Nozzle life is limited when using poor quality fuel.
Increased oil consumption tends to occur over time. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.22 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.90 m | |
| Nissan Navara is 37 cm longer than the Toyota Land Cruiser, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Navara is 12 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 620 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 13.3 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Navara is 1.9 metres more than that of the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means Nissan Navara can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`000 | 2`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6000 | 8400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Navara has
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has
| |