Nissan Navara 2005 vs Mitsubishi L 200 2006

 
Nissan Navara
2005 - 2009
Mitsubishi L 200
2006 - 2012
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.5 Diesel2.5 Diesel
Camshaft drive: Double-row timing chainTiming belt
Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating.

Performance

Power: 174 HP168 HP
Torque: 403 NM402 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.4 secondsn/a seconds
Nissan Navara engine produces 6 HP more power than Mitsubishi L 200, whereas torque is 1 NM more than Mitsubishi L 200.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.5no data
Fuel tank capacity: 80 litres75 litres
860 km with real consumption930 km with real consumption

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 440'000 km300'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Nissan Navara engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 26 years30 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan Pathfinder, Nissan MuranoUsed only for this car
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts.

Dimensions

Length: 5.22 mno data
Width: 1.85 mno data
Height: 1.78 mno data
Trunk capacity: no datano data
Turning diameter: 13.3 metersno data
Gross weight (kg): 3`0002`910
Safety: no data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 62008600
Pros and Cons: Nissan Navara has
  • timing chain engine
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • lower price
Mitsubishi L 200 has
  • timing belt engine
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv