Nissan Navara 2005 vs Land Rover Range Rover 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.9 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Double-row timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 174 HP | 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 403 NM | 390 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 13.6 seconds | |
|
Nissan Navara is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Navara engine produces 3 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover, but torque is 13 NM more than Land Rover Range Rover. Despite less power, Nissan Navara reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 11.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.3 l/100km | 12.2 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Navara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Navara consumes 2.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover, which means that by driving the Nissan Navara over 15,000 km in a year you can save 420 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Navara consumes 2.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 100 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 940 km in combined cycle | 880 km in combined cycle | |
| 1090 km on highway | 1060 km on highway | ||
| 860 km with real consumption | 810 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Navara gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Range Rover engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 27 years | 4 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan Pathfinder, Nissan Murano | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Navara might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Land Rover Range Rover engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.22 m | 4.95 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.96 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.82 m | |
| Nissan Navara is 27 cm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Navara is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 13.3 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Navara is 1.7 metres more than that of the Land Rover Range Rover, which means Nissan Navara can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`000 | 3`500 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6000 | 5800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Navara has
|
Land Rover Range Rover has
| |