Nissan Navara 2005 vs Land Rover Range Rover 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 4.2 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Nissan Navara) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Land Rover Range Rover) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Double-row timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 174 HP | 396 HP | |
| Torque: | 403 NM | 560 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 7.5 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Navara engine produces 222 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover, whereas torque is 157 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover. Due to the lower power, Nissan Navara reaches 100 km/h speed 3.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 16.0 | |
|
The Nissan Navara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Navara consumes 7.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover, which means that by driving the Nissan Navara over 15,000 km in a year you can save 1125 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 100 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 940 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
| Nissan Navara gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 27 years | 4 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan Pathfinder, Nissan Murano | Used also on Land Rover Range Rover Sport | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Navara might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.22 m | 4.95 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.96 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.82 m | |
| Nissan Navara is 27 cm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Navara is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 535 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 13.3 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Navara is 1.7 metres more than that of the Land Rover Range Rover, which means Nissan Navara can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`000 | 3`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6000 | 7400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Navara has
|
Land Rover Range Rover has
| |