Nissan Navara 2005 vs Land Rover Range Rover 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 4.4 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Double-row timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 174 HP | 313 HP | |
| Torque: | 403 NM | 700 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 7.8 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Navara engine produces 139 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover, whereas torque is 297 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover. Due to the lower power, Nissan Navara reaches 100 km/h speed 3.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 9.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.3 l/100km | 11.2 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Navara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Navara consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover, which means that by driving the Nissan Navara over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Navara consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 100 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 940 km in combined cycle | 1060 km in combined cycle | |
| 1090 km on highway | 1210 km on highway | ||
| 860 km with real consumption | 890 km with real consumption | ||
| Land Rover Range Rover gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Range Rover engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 26 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan Pathfinder, Nissan Murano | Used also on Land Rover Range Rover Sport | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Navara might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Land Rover Range Rover engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.22 m | 4.97 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | no data | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 13.3 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`000 | 3`200 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6200 | 15 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Navara has
|
Land Rover Range Rover has
| |