Nissan Navara 2005 vs Infiniti QX56 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 5.6 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Nissan Navara) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Infiniti QX56) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Double-row timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 174 HP | 325 HP | |
| Torque: | 403 NM | 533 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 7.8 seconds | |
|
Infiniti QX56 is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Navara engine produces 151 HP less power than Infiniti QX56, whereas torque is 130 NM less than Infiniti QX56. Due to the lower power, Nissan Navara reaches 100 km/h speed 3.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 15.3 | |
|
The Nissan Navara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Navara consumes 6.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Infiniti QX56, which means that by driving the Nissan Navara over 15,000 km in a year you can save 1020 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 105 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 940 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 1090 km on highway | 910 km on highway | ||
| Nissan Navara gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 27 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan Pathfinder, Nissan Murano | Used also on Nissan Patrol | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Navara might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.22 m | 5.26 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 2.02 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.97 m | |
|
Nissan Navara is smaller. Nissan Navara is 4 cm shorter than the Infiniti QX56, 17 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Navara is 19 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 642 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 13.3 meters | 12.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Navara is 0.7 metres more than that of the Infiniti QX56, which means Nissan Navara can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`000 | 3`310 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6000 | 9000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Navara has
|
Infiniti QX56 has
| |