Nissan Navara 2005 vs Ford Ranger 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 174 HP | 156 HP | |
| Torque: | 403 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 13.7 seconds | |
|
Nissan Navara is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Navara engine produces 18 HP more power than Ford Ranger, whereas torque is 23 NM more than Ford Ranger. Thanks to more power Nissan Navara reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 10.2 | |
|
The Nissan Navara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Navara consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Ranger, which means that by driving the Nissan Navara over 15,000 km in a year you can save 255 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 940 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 1090 km on highway | 780 km on highway | ||
| Nissan Navara gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.22 m | 5.08 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.76 m | |
|
Nissan Navara is larger. Nissan Navara is 14 cm longer than the Ford Ranger, 6 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Navara is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1500 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 13.3 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`000 | 3`000 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6000 | 7200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Navara has
|
| |