Nissan Navara 2005 vs Ford Ranger 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 174 HP | 143 HP | |
| Torque: | 403 NM | 330 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
|
Nissan Navara is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Navara engine produces 31 HP more power than Ford Ranger, whereas torque is 73 NM more than Ford Ranger. Thanks to more power Nissan Navara reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 8.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.3 l/100km | 9.4 l/100km | |
|
By specification Nissan Navara consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Ranger, which means that by driving the Nissan Navara over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Navara consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Ranger. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 940 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| 1090 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
| 860 km with real consumption | 740 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Navara gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.22 m | 5.08 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.62 m | |
|
Nissan Navara is larger. Nissan Navara is 15 cm longer than the Ford Ranger, 14 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Navara is 16 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1500 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 13.3 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`000 | 2`900 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 5600 | 7200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Navara has
|
| |