Nissan Navara 2005 vs Chrysler Pacifica 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 4.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Double-row timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 174 HP | 257 HP | |
| Torque: | 403 NM | 355 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Nissan Navara engine produces 83 HP less power than Chrysler Pacifica, but torque is 48 NM more than Chrysler Pacifica. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 12.3 | |
|
The Nissan Navara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Navara consumes 3.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Pacifica, which means that by driving the Nissan Navara over 15,000 km in a year you can save 570 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 87 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 940 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| 1090 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
| Nissan Navara gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 460'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 27 years | 4 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan Pathfinder, Nissan Murano | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Chrysler Town & Country, Dodge Caravan, Volkswagen Routan | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Chrysler Pacifica engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.22 m | 5.05 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 2.01 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.74 m | |
| Nissan Navara is 17 cm longer than the Chrysler Pacifica, 16 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Navara is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 370 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 370 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2250 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 13.3 meters | 12.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Navara is 1.2 metres more than that of the Chrysler Pacifica, which means Nissan Navara can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`000 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6000 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Navara has
|
Chrysler Pacifica has
| |