Nissan Navara 2005 vs Audi Q7 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 174 HP | 240 HP | |
| Torque: | 403 NM | 550 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
|
Audi Q7 is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Navara engine produces 66 HP less power than Audi Q7, whereas torque is 147 NM less than Audi Q7. Due to the lower power, Nissan Navara reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 9.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.3 l/100km | 11.2 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Navara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Navara consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q7, which means that by driving the Nissan Navara over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Navara consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q7. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 100 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 940 km in combined cycle | 1090 km in combined cycle | |
| 1090 km on highway | 1280 km on highway | ||
| 860 km with real consumption | 890 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi Q7 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.22 m | 5.09 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.98 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.74 m | |
| Nissan Navara is 13 cm longer than the Audi Q7, 13 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Navara is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 775 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2035 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 13.3 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Navara is 1.3 metres more than that of the Audi Q7, which means Nissan Navara can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`000 | 3`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 6000 | 15 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Navara has
|
Audi Q7 has
| |