Nissan Navara 2010 vs Nissan Pathfinder 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 231 HP | 260 HP | |
| Torque: | 550 NM | 325 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
|
Nissan Pathfinder is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Navara engine produces 29 HP less power than Nissan Pathfinder, but torque is 225 NM more than Nissan Pathfinder. Due to the lower power, Nissan Navara reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 | 10.0 | |
|
The Nissan Navara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Navara consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Pathfinder, which means that by driving the Nissan Navara over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 74 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| 1050 km on highway | 820 km on highway | ||
| Nissan Navara gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Nissan Pathfinder) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Nissan Navara) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 25 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Renault Laguna, Infiniti FX, Nissan Pathfinder | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Infiniti FX, Nissan Murano | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Nissan Navara engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Nissan Navara 2010 3.0 engine: The V9X engine stands out due to its unusual 65-degree V-angle. It features a lightweight cast-iron block, aluminum cylinder heads with hydraulic lifters, a variable geometry turbocharger, and a chain-driven timing ... More about Nissan Navara 2010 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.40 m | 5.01 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.96 m | |
| Height: | 1.79 m | 1.78 m | |
| Nissan Navara is 39 cm longer than the Nissan Pathfinder, 11 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 453 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 453 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2260 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 13.3 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`010 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 15 000 | 12 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Navara has
|
Nissan Pathfinder has
| |