Nissan Navara 2010 vs Ford Ranger 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 231 HP | 143 HP | |
| Torque: | 550 NM | 330 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
|
Nissan Navara is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Navara engine produces 88 HP more power than Ford Ranger, whereas torque is 220 NM more than Ford Ranger. Thanks to more power Nissan Navara reaches 100 km/h speed 3.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 | 8.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.8 l/100km | 9.4 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Ranger is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Nissan Navara consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Ranger, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Navara could require 90 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Navara consumes 2.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Ranger. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| 1050 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
| 670 km with real consumption | 740 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.40 m | 5.08 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.79 m | 1.62 m | |
|
Nissan Navara is larger. Nissan Navara is 32 cm longer than the Ford Ranger, 13 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Navara is 17 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1500 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 13.3 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`010 | 2`900 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 15 000 | 7400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Navara has
|
Ford Ranger has
| |