Nissan Navara 2010 vs Ford Ranger 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 231 HP | 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 550 NM | 470 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 10.4 seconds | |
|
Nissan Navara is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Navara engine produces 31 HP more power than Ford Ranger, whereas torque is 80 NM more than Ford Ranger. Thanks to more power Nissan Navara reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 | 10.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.8 l/100km | 13.0 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Navara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Navara consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Ranger, which means that by driving the Nissan Navara over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Navara consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Ranger. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 1050 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
| 670 km with real consumption | 610 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Navara gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Nissan Navara 2010 3.0 engine: The V9X engine stands out due to its unusual 65-degree V-angle. It features a lightweight cast-iron block, aluminum cylinder heads with hydraulic lifters, a variable geometry turbocharger, and a chain-driven timing ... More about Nissan Navara 2010 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.40 m | 5.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.79 m | 1.71 m | |
| Nissan Navara is 4 cm longer than the Ford Ranger, width is practically the same , while the height of Nissan Navara is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1450 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 13.3 meters | 12.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Navara is 0.6 metres more than that of the Ford Ranger, which means Nissan Navara can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 3`010 kg | 3`200 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`110 kg | 2`083 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 900 kg | 1`117 kg | |
| Nissan Navara load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 24 procentiem less than Ford Ranger. Therefore, Ford Ranger is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Ford Ranger scores higher in safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 14 600 | 16 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Navara has
|
Ford Ranger has
| |