Nissan Navara 2010 vs Ford Ranger 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 231 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 550 NM | 375 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 12.4 seconds | |
|
Nissan Navara is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Navara engine produces 81 HP more power than Ford Ranger, whereas torque is 175 NM more than Ford Ranger. Thanks to more power Nissan Navara reaches 100 km/h speed 3.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 | 9.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.8 l/100km | 10.7 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Ranger is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Nissan Navara consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Ranger, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Navara could require 15 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Navara consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Ranger. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 1050 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 670 km with real consumption | 740 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Nissan Navara 2010 3.0 engine: The V9X engine stands out due to its unusual 65-degree V-angle. It features a lightweight cast-iron block, aluminum cylinder heads with hydraulic lifters, a variable geometry turbocharger, and a chain-driven timing ... More about Nissan Navara 2010 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.40 m | 5.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.79 m | 1.71 m | |
| Nissan Navara is 4 cm longer than the Ford Ranger, width is practically the same , while the height of Nissan Navara is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1450 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 13.3 meters | 12.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Navara is 0.6 metres more than that of the Ford Ranger, which means Nissan Navara can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`010 | 3`200 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Ford Ranger scores higher in safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 15 000 | 18 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Navara has
|
Ford Ranger has
| |