Nissan Navara 2010 vs Ford Ranger 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 231 HP | 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 550 NM | 470 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 10.4 seconds | |
|
Nissan Navara is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Navara engine produces 31 HP more power than Ford Ranger, whereas torque is 80 NM more than Ford Ranger. Thanks to more power Nissan Navara reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 | 10.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.8 l/100km | 13.0 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Navara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Navara consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Ranger, which means that by driving the Nissan Navara over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Navara consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Ranger. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 1050 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
| 670 km with real consumption | 610 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Navara gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.40 m | 5.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.79 m | 1.82 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Nissan Navara is 4 cm longer than the Ford Ranger, width is practically the same , while the height of Nissan Navara is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1210 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 13.3 meters | 12.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Navara is 0.6 metres more than that of the Ford Ranger, which means Nissan Navara can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`010 | 1`109 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Ford Ranger scores higher in safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 14 800 | 20 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Navara has
|
Ford Ranger has
| |