Nissan Navara 2010 vs Ford Ranger 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 231 HP | 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 550 NM | 470 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
|
Nissan Navara is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Navara engine produces 31 HP more power than Ford Ranger, whereas torque is 80 NM more than Ford Ranger. Thanks to more power Nissan Navara reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 | 8.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.8 l/100km | 11.0 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Ranger is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Navara consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Ranger, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Navara could require 90 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Navara consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Ranger. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 890 km in combined cycle | |
| 1050 km on highway | 1080 km on highway | ||
| 670 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford Ranger gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Nissan Navara 2010 3.0 engine: The V9X engine stands out due to its unusual 65-degree V-angle. It features a lightweight cast-iron block, aluminum cylinder heads with hydraulic lifters, a variable geometry turbocharger, and a chain-driven timing ... More about Nissan Navara 2010 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.40 m | 5.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.79 m | 1.82 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Nissan Navara is 3 cm longer than the Ford Ranger, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Navara is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 13.3 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`010 | 3`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 15 200 | 27 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Navara has
|
Ford Ranger has
| |