Nissan Navara 2010 vs Ford Ranger 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 231 HP | 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 550 NM | 470 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Nissan Navara engine produces 31 HP more power than Ford Ranger, whereas torque is 80 NM more than Ford Ranger. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 | 8.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.8 l/100km | 11.0 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Ranger is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Navara consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Ranger, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Navara could require 150 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Navara consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Ranger. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 940 km in combined cycle | |
| 670 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford Ranger gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Nissan Navara 2010 3.0 engine: The V9X engine stands out due to its unusual 65-degree V-angle. It features a lightweight cast-iron block, aluminum cylinder heads with hydraulic lifters, a variable geometry turbocharger, and a chain-driven timing ... More about Nissan Navara 2010 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.40 m | 5.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.79 m | 1.82 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Nissan Navara is 3 cm longer than the Ford Ranger, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Navara is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 13.3 meters | no data | |
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight: | 3`010 kg | 3`200 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`110 kg | 1`883 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 900 kg | 1`317 kg | |
| Nissan Navara load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 46 procentiem less than Ford Ranger. Therefore, Ford Ranger is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 14 400 | 23 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Navara has
|
Ford Ranger has
| |