Nissan Navara 2010 vs Ford Explorer 2010
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 231 HP | 249 HP | |
Torque: | 550 NM | 345 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 8.7 seconds | |
Ford Explorer is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Navara engine produces 18 HP less power than Ford Explorer, but torque is 205 NM more than Ford Explorer. Due to the lower power, Nissan Navara reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 | 11.0 | |
The Nissan Navara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Navara consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Explorer, which means that by driving the Nissan Navara over 15,000 km in a year you can save 225 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 70 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
1050 km on highway | 790 km on highway | ||
Nissan Navara gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.40 m | 5.01 m | |
Width: | 1.85 m | 2.00 m | |
Height: | 1.79 m | 1.80 m | |
Nissan Navara is 39 cm longer than the Ford Explorer, 16 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Navara is 1 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 595 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 13.3 meters | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | 3`010 | no data | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 14 800 | 13 000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Navara has
|
Ford Explorer has
| |