Nissan Navara 2010 vs Dodge Durango 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 5.7 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Nissan Navara) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Dodge Durango) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 231 HP | 364 HP | |
| Torque: | 550 NM | 529 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Nissan Navara engine produces 133 HP less power than Dodge Durango, but torque is 21 NM more than Dodge Durango. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 | 13.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.8 l/100km | 14.4 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Navara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Navara consumes 4.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Dodge Durango, which means that by driving the Nissan Navara over 15,000 km in a year you can save 645 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Navara consumes 2.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Dodge Durango. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 93 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| 1050 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| 670 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Navara gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 17 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Renault Laguna, Infiniti FX, Nissan Pathfinder | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Dodge RAM, Dodge Charger | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Nissan Navara 2010 3.0 engine: The V9X engine stands out due to its unusual 65-degree V-angle. It features a lightweight cast-iron block, aluminum cylinder heads with hydraulic lifters, a variable geometry turbocharger, and a chain-driven timing ... More about Nissan Navara 2010 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.40 m | 5.11 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.79 m | 1.80 m | |
| Nissan Navara is 29 cm longer than the Dodge Durango, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Navara is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 490 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 490 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2410 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 13.3 meters | 12.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Navara is 0.8 metres more than that of the Dodge Durango, which means Nissan Navara can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`010 | 3`221 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 15 000 | 27 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Navara has
|
Dodge Durango has
| |