Nissan Navara 2010 vs Dodge Durango 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 231 HP | 294 HP | |
| Torque: | 550 NM | 353 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Nissan Navara engine produces 63 HP less power than Dodge Durango, but torque is 197 NM more than Dodge Durango. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 | 11.2 | |
|
The Nissan Navara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Navara consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Dodge Durango, which means that by driving the Nissan Navara over 15,000 km in a year you can save 255 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 93 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 1050 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Renault Laguna, Infiniti FX, Nissan Pathfinder | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Jeep Grand Cherokee, Chrysler Grand Voyager, Chrysler Town & Country | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Dodge Durango might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Nissan Navara 2010 3.0 engine: The V9X engine stands out due to its unusual 65-degree V-angle. It features a lightweight cast-iron block, aluminum cylinder heads with hydraulic lifters, a variable geometry turbocharger, and a chain-driven timing ... More about Nissan Navara 2010 3.0 engine Dodge Durango 2013 3.6 engine: The variable valve timing regulators, oil pump, water pump, and thermostat are known for their limited lifespan. Another common issue is the clogging of oil channels with wear particles. After ... More about Dodge Durango 2013 3.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.40 m | 5.11 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.79 m | 1.80 m | |
| Nissan Navara is 29 cm longer than the Dodge Durango, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Navara is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 490 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 490 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2410 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 13.3 meters | 12.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Navara is 0.8 metres more than that of the Dodge Durango, which means Nissan Navara can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`010 | 2`948 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 15 000 | 27 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Navara has
|
Dodge Durango has
| |