Nissan Navara 2010 vs Audi Q7 2009
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 231 HP | 240 HP | |
| Torque: | 550 NM | 550 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
|
Audi Q7 is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Navara engine produces 9 HP less power than Audi Q7, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Nissan Navara reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 | 9.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.8 l/100km | 11.2 l/100km | |
|
The Audi Q7 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Nissan Navara consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q7, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Navara could require 60 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Navara consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q7. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 100 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 1090 km in combined cycle | |
| 1050 km on highway | 1280 km on highway | ||
| 670 km with real consumption | 890 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi Q7 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Nissan Navara 2010 3.0 engine: The V9X engine stands out due to its unusual 65-degree V-angle. It features a lightweight cast-iron block, aluminum cylinder heads with hydraulic lifters, a variable geometry turbocharger, and a chain-driven timing ... More about Nissan Navara 2010 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.40 m | 5.09 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.98 m | |
| Height: | 1.79 m | 1.74 m | |
| Nissan Navara is 31 cm longer than the Audi Q7, 14 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Navara is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 775 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2035 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 13.3 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Navara is 1.3 metres more than that of the Audi Q7, which means Nissan Navara can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`010 | 3`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 15 000 | 15 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Navara has
|
Audi Q7 has
| |