Nissan Navara 2010 vs Mitsubishi L 200 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Double-row timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 NM | 314 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 17.8 seconds | |
|
Nissan Navara is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Navara engine produces 54 HP more power than Mitsubishi L 200, whereas torque is 136 NM more than Mitsubishi L 200. Thanks to more power Nissan Navara reaches 100 km/h speed 7.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 8.7 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 75 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 300'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Nissan Navara engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 27 years | 30 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan Pathfinder, Nissan Murano | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.40 m | 5.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.79 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Nissan Navara is larger. Nissan Navara is 40 cm longer than the Mitsubishi L 200, 5 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Navara is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 13.3 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Navara is 1.5 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi L 200, which means Nissan Navara can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`805 | 2`850 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 15 000 | 10 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Navara has
|
Mitsubishi L 200 has
| |