Nissan Navara 1998 vs Volvo XC90 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 148 HP | 210 HP | |
| Torque: | 208 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
| Nissan Navara engine produces 62 HP less power than Volvo XC90, whereas torque is 112 NM less than Volvo XC90. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 11.0 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 70 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.22 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.77 m | 1.74 m | |
| Nissan Navara is 42 cm longer than the Volvo XC90, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Navara is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 249 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2404 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 13.4 meters | 12.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Navara is 0.7 metres more than that of the Volvo XC90, which means Nissan Navara can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`700 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 10 400 | 4200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |