Nissan Navara 1998 vs Jeep Wrangler 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 148 HP | 118 HP | |
| Torque: | 208 NM | 186 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 14.1 seconds | |
| Nissan Navara engine produces 30 HP more power than Jeep Wrangler, whereas torque is 22 NM more than Jeep Wrangler. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 11.6 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 72 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.22 m | 3.88 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.77 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Nissan Navara is larger, but slightly lower. Nissan Navara is 134 cm longer than the Jeep Wrangler, 11 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 315 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1515 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 13.4 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Navara is 3.2 metres more than that of the Jeep Wrangler, which means Nissan Navara can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`925 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 10 400 | 13 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Navara has
|
Jeep Wrangler has
| |