Nissan Navara 1998 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 3.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 133 HP | 165 HP | |
| Torque: | 304 NM | 373 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 13.8 seconds | |
| Nissan Navara engine produces 32 HP less power than Mitsubishi Pajero, whereas torque is 69 NM less than Mitsubishi Pajero. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 10.5 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 90 litres | |
| 720 km with real consumption | 860 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.22 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.77 m | 1.86 m | |
| Nissan Navara is 42 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Navara is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 13.4 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Navara is 2 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means Nissan Navara can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 3`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 10 400 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |