Nissan Navara 1998 vs Jeep Wrangler 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.5 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Nissan Navara) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Jeep Wrangler) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Double-row timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 133 HP | 118 HP | |
| Torque: | 304 NM | 186 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 14.1 seconds | |
| Nissan Navara engine produces 15 HP more power than Jeep Wrangler, whereas torque is 118 NM more than Jeep Wrangler. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 11.6 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 72 litres | |
| 720 km with real consumption | 570 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 460'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 27 years | 19 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan Pathfinder, Nissan Murano | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Navara might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Jeep Wrangler engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.22 m | 3.88 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.77 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Nissan Navara is larger, but slightly lower. Nissan Navara is 134 cm longer than the Jeep Wrangler, 11 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 315 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1515 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 13.4 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Navara is 3.2 metres more than that of the Jeep Wrangler, which means Nissan Navara can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`925 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 10 400 | 13 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Navara has
|
Jeep Wrangler has
| |