Nissan Navara 1998 vs Mazda BT-50 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 148 HP | 143 HP | |
| Torque: | 314 NM | 330 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
| Nissan Navara engine produces 5 HP more power than Mazda BT-50, but torque is 16 NM less than Mazda BT-50. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 8.9 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 70 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.22 m | 5.08 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.77 m | 1.76 m | |
|
Nissan Navara is larger. Nissan Navara is 15 cm longer than the Mazda BT-50, 5 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Navara is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 13.4 meters | 12.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Navara is 0.9 metres more than that of the Mazda BT-50, which means Nissan Navara can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 3`030 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 10 400 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mazda BT-50 has
| |