Nissan Navara 1998 vs Isuzu D-Max 2008
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 148 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 314 NM | 333 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 20 seconds | |
| Nissan Navara engine produces 15 HP less power than Isuzu D-Max, whereas torque is 19 NM less than Isuzu D-Max. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 8.4 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 76 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 360'000 km | 700'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Isuzu D-Max engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 21 years | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Isuzu D-Max might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Isuzu D-Max 2008 3.0 engine: The engine is robust, as is the fuel delivery system, provided quality fuel is used. This engine is characterised by vibrations and is quite noisy. The engine chain tends to last a long time, but the tensioner ... More about Isuzu D-Max 2008 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.22 m | 5.16 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.77 m | 1.73 m | |
|
Nissan Navara is larger. Nissan Navara is 7 cm longer than the Isuzu D-Max, 5 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Navara is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 13.4 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 10 400 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Isuzu D-Max has
| |