Nissan Navara engine produces 40 HP more power than Mazda BT-50, whereas torque is 100 NM more than Mazda BT-50.
Fuel consumption
Fuel consumption (l/100km):
6.4
6.6
Nissan Navara consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda BT-50, which means that by driving the Nissan Navara over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel.
Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda BT-50 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mazda BT-50 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from three 4x4 versions of Mazda BT-50 2020 if off-road driveability is important to you.
Dimensions
Length:
5.33 m
5.28 m
Width:
1.85 m
no data
Height:
1.83 m
1.79 m
Trunk capacity:
no data
no data
Turning diameter:
12.4 meters
12.5 meters
The turning circle of the Nissan Navara is 0.1 metres less than that of the Mazda BT-50.
Power steering:
Electric power steering
Hydraulic power steering
Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering.
Gross weight:
3`250 kg
3`000 kg
Net weight:
2`115 kg
1`779 kg
Load capacity:
1`135 kg
1`221 kg
Nissan Navara load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 8 procentiem less than Mazda BT-50. Therefore, Mazda BT-50 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads.
