Nissan Navara 2019 vs Ford Ranger 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 NM | 330 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 14.9 seconds | |
|
Nissan Navara is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Navara engine produces 60 HP more power than Ford Ranger, whereas torque is 120 NM more than Ford Ranger. Thanks to more power Nissan Navara reaches 100 km/h speed 3.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 7.0 | |
|
The Nissan Navara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Navara consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Ranger, which means that by driving the Nissan Navara over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 73 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1140 km in combined cycle | 1140 km in combined cycle | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 223 mm (8.8 inches) | 237 mm (9.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Ford Ranger can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.33 m | 5.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.83 m | 1.82 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Nissan Navara is 3 cm shorter than the Ford Ranger, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Navara is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight: | 3`250 kg | 3`200 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`115 kg | 2`014 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 1`135 kg | 1`186 kg | |
| Nissan Navara load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 4 procentiem less than Ford Ranger. Therefore, Ford Ranger is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 15 800 | 23 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Navara has
|
Ford Ranger has
| |