Nissan Navara 2019 vs Ford Ranger 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Diesel | 3.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 NM | 470 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Nissan Navara engine produces 10 HP less power than Ford Ranger, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Ford Ranger. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 | 8.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.7 l/100km | 11.0 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Navara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Navara consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Ranger, which means that by driving the Nissan Navara over 15,000 km in a year you can save 225 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Navara consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Ranger. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 73 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1040 km in combined cycle | 940 km in combined cycle | |
| 680 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Ground clearance: | 223 mm (8.8 inches) | 232 mm (9.1 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.33 m | 5.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.83 m | 1.82 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Nissan Navara is 3 cm shorter than the Ford Ranger, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Navara is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight: | 3`250 kg | 3`200 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`115 kg | 1`883 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 1`135 kg | 1`317 kg | |
| Nissan Navara load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 16 procentiem less than Ford Ranger. Therefore, Ford Ranger is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 15 800 | 23 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Navara has
|
Ford Ranger has
| |