Nissan Navara 2019 vs Ford Ranger 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 NM | 385 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Nissan Navara engine produces 30 HP more power than Ford Ranger, whereas torque is 65 NM more than Ford Ranger. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 | 7.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.4 l/100km | 9.6 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Ranger is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Nissan Navara consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Ranger, which means that by driving the Nissan Navara over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Nissan Navara consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Ranger. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 73 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1040 km in combined cycle | 1060 km in combined cycle | |
| 700 km with real consumption | 830 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.33 m | 5.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.83 m | 1.82 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Nissan Navara is 3 cm shorter than the Ford Ranger, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Navara is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`250 | 3`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 30 800 | 31 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Navara has
|
| |