Nissan Navara 2019 vs BMW 3 series 2005
| Body: | Crossover / SUV | Estate car / wagon | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.3 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 8.8 seconds | |
| Nissan Navara engine produces 27 HP more power than BMW 3 series, whereas torque is 110 NM more than BMW 3 series. Despite the higher power, Nissan Navara reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 | 6.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.6 l/100km | 7.3 l/100km | |
|
The BMW 3 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Navara consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Navara could require 15 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Navara consumes 3.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 73 litres | 61 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1040 km in combined cycle | 880 km in combined cycle | |
| 680 km with real consumption | 830 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.33 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.83 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Nissan Navara is larger. Nissan Navara is 81 cm longer than the BMW 3 series, 3 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Navara is 39 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 460 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1385 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Navara is 1.4 metres more than that of the BMW 3 series, which means Nissan Navara can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`250 | 2`060 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 31 200 | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Navara has
|
BMW 3 sērija has
| |