Nissan Navara 2010 vs Volkswagen Amarok 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 403 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 10.3 seconds | |
| Nissan Navara engine produces 10 HP more power than Volkswagen Amarok, whereas torque is 3 NM more than Volkswagen Amarok. Despite the higher power, Nissan Navara reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 | 7.4 | |
|
The Volkswagen Amarok is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Navara consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Amarok, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Navara could require 135 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 960 km in combined cycle | 1080 km in combined cycle | |
| 1140 km on highway | 1190 km on highway | ||
| Volkswagen Amarok gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.22 m | 5.25 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.79 m | 1.83 m | |
|
Nissan Navara is smaller. Nissan Navara is 3 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Amarok, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Navara is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 13.2 meters | 12.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Navara is 0.3 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Amarok. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`805 | 2`820 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Nissan Navara scores higher in safety tests, but Volkswagen Amarok is better rated in child safety tests. The Nissan Navara scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 15 000 | 17 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Navara has
|
Volkswagen Amarok has
| |