Nissan Navara 2010 vs Volkswagen Amarok 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 403 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 12.9 seconds | |
|
Nissan Navara is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Navara engine produces 50 HP more power than Volkswagen Amarok, whereas torque is 63 NM more than Volkswagen Amarok. Thanks to more power Nissan Navara reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 | 7.2 | |
|
The Volkswagen Amarok is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Navara consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Amarok, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Navara could require 165 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 960 km in combined cycle | 1110 km in combined cycle | |
| 1140 km on highway | 1290 km on highway | ||
| Volkswagen Amarok gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.22 m | 5.25 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.79 m | 1.83 m | |
|
Nissan Navara is smaller. Nissan Navara is 3 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Amarok, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Navara is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 13.2 meters | 12.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Navara is 0.3 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Amarok. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`805 | 2`820 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Nissan Navara scores higher in safety tests, but Volkswagen Amarok is better rated in child safety tests. The Nissan Navara scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 15 000 | 17 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Navara has
|
Volkswagen Amarok has
| |