Nissan Navara 2010 vs Toyota Hilux 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Double-row timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 144 HP | |
| Torque: | 403 NM | 343 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 13.3 seconds | |
|
Nissan Navara is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Navara engine produces 46 HP more power than Toyota Hilux, whereas torque is 60 NM more than Toyota Hilux. Thanks to more power Nissan Navara reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 | 7.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.6 l/100km | 9.1 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Hilux is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Navara consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Hilux, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Navara could require 150 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Navara consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Hilux. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 960 km in combined cycle | 1090 km in combined cycle | |
| 1140 km on highway | 1210 km on highway | ||
| 830 km with real consumption | 870 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Hilux gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 26 years | 23 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan Pathfinder, Nissan Murano | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Navara might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.22 m | 5.26 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.79 m | 1.86 m | |
| Nissan Navara is 4 cm shorter than the Toyota Hilux, 9 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Navara is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 900 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 13.2 meters | 13.2 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`805 | 2`690 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 15 000 | 16 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Navara has
|
Toyota Hilux has
| |